September 9, 2012
On September 10, 2012, Secretary-General of the United Nations Ban Ki-moon will open a reading room at the UN office in Geneva, Switzerland- dedicated to none other than international philanthropist (and by far the most generous beneficiary of 20th century eugenics) John D. Rockefeller Jr.
Besides the UN Secretary General, the opening will be attended by the Director General of the Geneva UN office Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, the US permanent representative to the UN Betty King- as well as John D.’s great grandson Michael Rockefeller, who will be representing the family at the occasion.
Commemorating the 85th anniversary of Rockefeller’s donations to the League of Nations- the predecessor of the United Nations- the invitation states that “this exhibition highlights the essential role played by the Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace between 1920 and 1945 in the key technical activities of the League of Nations.”
After the League of Nations had outplayed itself after the rise of Hitler, Rockefeller also funded into being its successor. When Europe was still smouldering after World War II, Rockefeller Jr. donated six blocks of midtown Manhattan near the East River to accommodate the United Nations. His gift was worth $ 8.5 million. In 1945, this was an unprecedented amount.
Describing the late John D. Rockefeller Jr. as a “visionary philanthropist”, the website of the United Nations office in Geneva states that the event “has been conceived in line with the Secretary-General’s directive to “harness the full power of partnership”, to strengthen outreach activities and enhance the visibility of Geneva as a centre for international cooperation.”
The reading room is part of the UN archival library, describing itself as “part of a strong network of United Nations and UN system libraries, that share expertise, best practices and resources, and cooperate to ensure the best quality of products and services for their users.”
Rockefeller’s contributions to the first League of Nations library had amounted to a then unprecedented amount of $ 2 million. When the UN people describe Rockefeller as a visionary philanthropist, they are not kidding. The tycoon had funded all major international organizations into being that still call the shots. Besides countless other funding-campaigns, JDR Jr was reponsible for the following disturbing donations:
1: (from Wikipedia “crucially funded the formation and ongoing expenses of the Council on Foreign Relationships and its initial headquarters building, in New York in 1921.”
2: “established the Bureau of Social Hygiene in 1913.”
3: “provided crucial funding for Margaret Sanger in her work on birth control clinics and involvement in population issues.”
In the following eyeopening video provided by Oldthinkernews, the family’s involvement in eugenics is being elaborated upon:
The newly to be opened reading room, attended by none other than the Secretary General of the UN, can be considered a sick joke by the elite. It also has a cynical aspect to it. By providing the family correspondence for all researchers to investigate, the Rockefellers themselves can always with a more or less clear conscience state they are not working in secret. After all, are their archives not open to the public? The reason this is cynical in all respects, is that the elite knows only a handful of people will actually investigate. Just like in other archives, such as the Rockefeller Archives, researchers can find a lot of in-your-face eugenics confessions that will make the hairs in your neck stand on end. In my July 1 2012 article Rockefeller Council Demographers Subjected American Slums To Eugenic Mind-Control Ops, I quote directly from archive material, in which we learn of criminal activities by the Council and its demographers in the early 1960s.
The elite’s archiving activities are also being used to deflect crimes committed, focusing on petty historical curiosities, such as happened in 2009 when the Financial Times reported on the Rothschild family ties to slave traders.
Acting greatly surprised, British investment bank Rothschild in response had said it regretted “that the firm is linked in any way to the inhumane institution of slavery.” Supposedly big news to them, the ancient Rothschild establishment quickly muttered sounds of indignation after the report appeared in the new world order’s main media outlet, the Financial Times.
According to the 2009 FT article, the chief archivist of the Rothschild family papers “reacted with disbelief when first told of the content of the records, saying she had never seen such links before.”
The archivist in question must have either suffered from long-term memory loss, or her masters have employed the woman because of her excellent lying skills. Although called a “scoop” by Lionel Barber in his pick of the week, the family’s links to slave trade have been thoroughly documented throughout the last decades by numerous independent researchers. But never mind that.
The Financial Times nevertheless claims to have broken the story on June 27th that Nathan Mayer Rothschild benefited financially from slavery. According to the article, records at the National Archives in Britain contain evidence that the family patriarch “made personal gains by using slaves as collateral in banking dealings with a slave owner.”
Well yeah. It should come as no surprise for anyone who has even superficially glanced over the annals of Rothschild history that the family has engaged in slavery, not just “with links” to slave-owners. They, like all other black nobility, are the slave-owners.
Should we be genuinely surprised about links to slavery from the man who told us “I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of England to rule the Empire, (…). The man that controls Britain’s money supply controls the British Empire. And I control the money supply.”?
Obviously Nathan Mayor Rothschild’s links to slavery have not been limited to just incidental financial ties to slave-owners, the name of Rothschild is synonymous with the very concept of slavery- which the dictionary defines as “a form of forced labour in which people are considered to be, or treated as, the property of others.” And that just about covers the entire history of the Redshield genealogy, from its registered beginnings in the 18th century to our current days- where the family uses not chains to put people into submission, but carbon credits and other global taxation policies in the name of “sustainable development.”
Another definition of slavery is given by the online dictionary, summing up the family practices pretty well:
“The state of one bound in servitude as the property of a slaveholder or household.” The only difference between the slavery practiced by bearded slave masters on creaking coffin-ships and the Rothschild family is the scale of the slavery, magnified to proportions way beyond normal human understanding. Unless you disregard bounding nations in economic choke-holds as a form of slavery, the family Rothschild is the ultimate slaveholder, exceeding anything a regular slave master could possibly be engaged in. This whole dirty business in which the family excels is reminiscent of the words of Joseph Stalin: “The death of one man is a tragedy. The death of millions is a statistic.”
By focusing in on this or that incidental involvement in the slave trade, the Financial Times cleverly shifted the true blame away from the real crime perpetrated by the family: the enslavement of nations by controlling the money supply. This allows for the family to react with feigned repentance over long forgotten mishaps, while breathing a sigh of relief that the carefully contrived plan for world domination remains safely locked inside the family chest of secrets.
Perhaps it would be an idea to pull out a shovel and visit some of these archives- including the fresh Rockefeller reading room in Geneva. No doubt a treasure of confessed treacheries will surface and we may be able to use their own “transparency” against them.